Quote:
Originally Posted by tilezanj
why them? Iraqis are killing Iraqis in a sectarian war. They've got to put their shit together. Before Bush and Cheney there was Saddham Hussein and life was no better. Those Iraqis had a chance to have a normal country after Saddham's topple. They've opted for the extremist path.
So wouldn't be fair not to look at them without putting some blame on them.
Perhaps Bush and Cheney should have never invaded Iraq, but there again same people writing here whould have qualified them all names for not doing anything against Saddham's murderous spree TERRITORIALLY and NATIONALLY.
You're damn if you do and you'r damn if you don't.
About time we start shifting blames where it supposed to be shifted. I say, those Iraquis bear all the blame. |
You sir have issues.
Sure Saddam should not have invaded Kuwait but once he was kicked out of there they should not have had all these tough sanctions on the damn country because you hate its leader. All the sudden you have an entire nation suffering because of its leader's mistake and you putting an embargo on them is making the situation worse.
Restrict their ability to rearm themselves but dont stop their economic growth. And that is what this is about. Their economy is in ruin so therefore these mothers do the unthinkable to feed their children.
Then Comes the Bush and Dick bombing the country setting them even further back. Now not only must they deal with the economic problems they already had but all the sudden a civil war breaks out where different sect that Saddam was able to keep in check are killing eachother.
Now are you keeping score? Let's add them up shall we;
Already having economic issues because of they imposed sanctions that were too tough.
Get bombed and most of your infrastructure is in ruins
Get your dignity taken away because G.I.'s must now search your ass everywhere you go.
Now you have a civil war on your hands.
yeah you're right. Bush/the U.S. have nothing to do with this
